World Library  


Add to Book Shelf
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Book

Metrology of Ground-based Satellite Validation: Co-location Mismatch and Smoothing Issues of Total Ozone Comparisons : Volume 8, Issue 8 (04/08/2015)

By Verhoelst, T.

Click here to view

Book Id: WPLBN0004000550
Format Type: PDF Article :
File Size: Pages 60
Reproduction Date: 2015

Title: Metrology of Ground-based Satellite Validation: Co-location Mismatch and Smoothing Issues of Total Ozone Comparisons : Volume 8, Issue 8 (04/08/2015)  
Author: Verhoelst, T.
Volume: Vol. 8, Issue 8
Language: English
Subject: Science, Atmospheric, Measurement
Collections: Periodicals: Journal and Magazine Collection, Copernicus GmbH
Historic
Publication Date:
2015
Publisher: Copernicus Gmbh, Göttingen, Germany
Member Page: Copernicus Publications

Citation

APA MLA Chicago

Köhler, U., Pommereau, J., Lerot, C., Verhoelst, T., Lambert, J., Redondas, A.,...Roozendael, M. V. (2015). Metrology of Ground-based Satellite Validation: Co-location Mismatch and Smoothing Issues of Total Ozone Comparisons : Volume 8, Issue 8 (04/08/2015). Retrieved from http://worldebooklibrary.com/


Description
Description: Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (BIRA-IASB), Ringlaan 3, 1180 Uccle, Belgium. Comparisons with ground-based correlative measurements constitute a key component in the validation of satellite data on atmospheric composition. The error budget of these comparisons contains not only the measurement uncertainties but also several terms related to differences in sampling and smoothing of the inhomogeneous and variable atmospheric field. A versatile system for Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs), named OSSSMOSE, is used here to quantify these terms. Based on the application of pragmatic observation operators onto high-resolution atmospheric fields, it allows a simulation of each individual measurement, and consequently also of the differences to be expected from spatial and temporal field variations between both measurements making up a comparison pair. As a topical case study, the system is used to evaluate the error budget of total ozone column (TOC) comparisons between on the one hand GOME-type direct fitting (GODFITv3) satellite retrievals from GOME/ERS2, SCIAMACHY/Envisat, and GOME-2/MetOp-A, and on the other hand direct-sun and zenith-sky reference measurements such as from Dobsons, Brewers, and zenith scattered light (ZSL-)DOAS instruments respectively. In particular, the focus is placed on the GODFITv3 reprocessed GOME-2A data record vs. the ground-based instruments contributing to the Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC). The simulations are found to reproduce the actual measurements almost to within the measurement uncertainties, confirming that the OSSE approach and its technical implementation are appropriate. This work reveals that many features of the comparison spread and median difference can be understood as due to metrological differences, even when using strict co-location criteria. In particular, sampling difference errors exceed measurement uncertainties regularly at most mid- and high-latitude stations, with values up to 10 % and more in extreme cases. Smoothing difference errors only play a role in the comparisons with ZSL-DOAS instruments at high latitudes, especially in the presence of a polar vortex. At tropical latitudes, where TOC variability is lower, both types of errors remain below about 1 % and consequently do not contribute significantly to the comparison error budget. The detailed analysis of the comparison results, including now the metrological errors, suggests that the published random measurement uncertainties for GODFITv3 reprocessed satellite data are potentially overestimated, and adjustments are proposed here. This successful application of the OSSSMOSE sytem to close for the first time the error budget of TOC comparisons, bodes well for potential future applications, which are briefly touched upon.

Summary
Metrology of ground-based satellite validation: co-location mismatch and smoothing issues of total ozone comparisons

Excerpt
Arnold Jr., C. P. and Dey, C. H.: Observing-systems simulation experiments: past, present, and future, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 67, 687–695, 2.0.CO;2>doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1986)067<0687:OSSEPP>2.0.CO;2, 1986.; Balis, D., Kroon, M., Koukouli, M. E., Brinksma, E. J., Labow, G., Veefkind, J. P., and McPeters, R. D.: Validation of Ozone Monitoring Instrument total ozone column measurements using Brewer and Dobson spectrophotometer ground-based observations, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D24S46, doi:10.1029/2007JD008796, 2007.; Balis, D., Lambert, J.-C., Van Roozendael, M., Loyola, D., Spurr, R., Livschitz, Y., Valks, P., Amiridis, V., Gerard, P., and Granville, J.: Ten years of GOME/ERS-2 total ozone data – the new GOME Data Processor (GDP) Version 4: II Ground-based validation and comparisons with TOMS V7/V8, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D07307, doi:10.1029/2005JD006376, 2007b.; Bernhard, G., Evans, R. D., Labow, G. J., and Oltmans, S. J.: Bias in Dobson total ozone measurements at high latitudes due to approximations in calculations of ozone absorption coefficients and air mass, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D10305, doi:10.1029/2004JD005559, 2005.; Dobson, G. M. B.: Observer's Handbook for the Ozone Spectrophotometer, Annales International Geophysical Year, V, Part I: Ozone, Pergamon Press Ed., New York, 1957.; Bramstedt, K., Gleason, J., Loyola, D., Thomas, W., Bracher, A., Weber, M., and Burrows, J. P.: Comparison of total ozone from the satellite instruments GOME and TOMS with measurements from the Dobson network 1996–2000, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 1409–1419, doi:10.5194/acp-3-1409-2003, 2003.; Cortesi, U., Lambert, J. C., De Clercq, C., Bianchini, G., Blumenstock, T., Bracher, A., Castelli, E., Catoire, V., Chance, K. V., De Mazière, M., Demoulin, P., Godin-Beekmann, S., Jones, N., Jucks, K., Keim, C., Kerzenmacher, T., Kuellmann, H., Kuttippurath, J., Iarlori, M., Liu, G. Y., Liu, Y., McDermid, I. S., Meijer, Y. J., Mencaraglia, F., Mikuteit, S., Oelhaf, H., Piccolo, C., Pirre, M., Raspollini, P., Ravegnani, F., Reburn, W. J., Redaelli, G., Remedios, J. J., Sembhi, H., Smale, D., Steck, T., Taddei, A., Varotsos, C., Vigouroux, C., Waterfall, A., Wetzel, G., and Wood, S.: Geophysical validation of MIPAS-ENVISAT operational ozone data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4807–4867, doi:10.5194/acp-7-4807-2007, 2007.; Errico, R. M., Yang, R., Privé, N. C., Tai, K.-S., Todling, R., Sienkiewicz, M. E., and Guo, J.: Development and validation of observing-system simulation experiments at NASA's Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 139, 1162–1178, doi:10.1002/qj.2027, 2013.; Fassò, A., Ignaccolo, R., Madonna, F., Demoz, B. B., and Franco-Villoria, M.: Statistical modelling of collocation uncertainty in atmospheric thermodynamic profiles, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1803–1816, doi:10.5194/amt-7-1803-2014, 2014.; Fioletov, V. E., Labow, G., Evans, R., Hare, E. W., Köhler, U., McElroy, C. T., Miyagawa, K., Redondas, A., Savastiouk, V., Shalamyansky, A. M., Staehelin, J., Vanicek, K., and Weber, M.: Performance of the ground-based total ozone network assessed using satellite data, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D14313, doi:10.1029/2008JD009809, 2008.; Fortuin, J. and Kelder, H.: An ozone climatology based on ozonesonde and satellite measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 709–734, 1998.; GCOS: Systematic Observation Requirements for Satellite-based produ

 

Click To View

Additional Books


  • A Novel Whole Air Sample Profiler (Wasp)... (by )
  • Measurement of Non-volatile Particle Num... (by )
  • Fast No2 Retrievals from Odin-osiris Lim... (by )
  • Empirical Validation and Proof of Added ... (by )
  • Retrieval of Aerosol Mass Load (Pm10) fr... (by )
  • The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (A... (by )
  • Determining the Sea-air Flux of Dimethyl... (by )
  • Tomographic Retrieval of Water Vapour an... (by )
  • Automated Rain Rate Estimates Using the ... (by )
  • Cloud Discrimination in Probability Dens... (by )
  • Exploring Earth's Atmosphere with Radio ... (by )
  • Quantifying Amine Permeation Sources wit... (by )
Scroll Left
Scroll Right

 



Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.